The chapter in which the enterprise, the estate, and the architecture must rise together.
The work the enterprise demands, and the work it does not.
The founder’s attention belongs to the enterprise. That is, almost without exception, where it should be in the years the company is being built. The unit economics, the hiring, the customers, the next round of capital — these are matters of consequence, and they reward the operator’s undivided focus.
What the founder rarely has time to attend to in those years is the architecture being built around the enterprise. The corporate structure assembled in haste. The compensation rhythm set in the first year and never revisited. The estate plan deferred for the next quieter season that does not arrive. The insurance acquired as a product rather than composed as infrastructure. None of it constitutes a failure; it is the consequence of a single principal carrying every decision at once.
The founder’s chapter is the chapter in which a coordinating architect becomes, structurally, of greater value than any single specialist the family might add. The work is to compose the architecture beneath the enterprise — quietly, in concert with the family’s existing counsel — so that what the operator is building has a structure underneath it equal to what is being built on top.
Four points at which the architecture compounds.
Each is a decision the operator rarely has the hours to convene the right table around. Each, attended to in time, materially shapes the family’s position twenty years on.
The corporate structure, before it ossifies.
The operating company, the holdco, the family trust, the spousal share class, the rolling estate freeze. The choices made in the first three to five years determine the optionality available for the next thirty. Restructuring later is rarely impossible — only expensive and time-bound. We compose the structure with corporate counsel and tax counsel before the file requires unwinding.
The compensation rhythm, beyond annual draws.
Salary, dividends, capital extraction, capital dividend account, RDTOH, lifetime capital gains exemption multiplication across the family. The four mechanisms are weighed together against the family’s long-horizon tax position, not chosen in isolation each fiscal year. The design produces materially different after-tax outcomes over a decade than the default sequence most owner-managers run.
The estate, before it catches up to the enterprise.
The freeze, the secondary will, the powers of attorney, the cross-border wills set if the family has interests outside Canada. The deemed disposition under s. 70 of the Income Tax Act is rarely the planning event most families think it is — the planning event is the structure put in place a decade earlier, while time and capacity were on the family’s side.
Insurance, as infrastructure rather than purchase.
Permanent coverage held corporately, sized to the projected estate liability and the buy-sell obligation, layered over time as the enterprise grows. Insurance arranged in the founder’s chapter — while underwriting is favourable and the family is healthy — is materially less expensive and materially more useful than insurance arranged later in answer to a problem already arrived.
Year one, then a continuing rhythm.
The first year of the engagement is devoted to architecture. The family’s existing counsel remains in place; we convene the table, document the structure as it stands, and produce a written architectural review — circulated in draft to every advisor before any action is taken. The output is a Family Policy Statement: the central operating artifact of the relationship for the years that follow.
From that foundation, the relationship operates on a continuing cadence. Quarterly reviews. Coordinated counsel ahead of transactions, not after them. A single point of accountability for the structural integrity of the family’s affairs as the enterprise, the family, and the balance sheet evolve.
“The freeze, the buy-sell, the holdco insurance, the spousal trust — each had been attended to capably, by capable advisors, in different years. The work of the engagement was not to redo any of it. It was to put it in relation to the rest, and to the family the structure was built for.”
If the chapter described above resembles your own, the next step is a private conversation.
Senatus accepts a limited number of new relationships each year, predominantly through private referral. A member of the Private Office will respond, in confidence, within twenty-four hours.
Request a Private ConversationTwelve adjacent audiences.
Most principals belong to more than one. The architecture is composed for the family in front of us; the descriptions below are how families most often arrive.